April 29, 2013
Freeshipping.com “Data Pass” Marketing Settlement
On April 29, 2013, Judge Marilyn L. Huff of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted final approval to the nationwide class settlement in Cox, et al. v. Clarus Marketing Group, LLC and Provide-Commerce, Inc.
April 17, 2013
Michaels Stores Data Breach Settlement
On April 17, 2013, Judge Thomas M. Durkin of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted final approval to the nationwide class settlement in In re: Michaels Stores Pin Pad Litigation. In May 2011, Bursor ...
February 13, 2013
California Supreme Court Rejects Sprint’s Latest Appeal; Bursor & Fisher’s $299 Million Trial Victory Survives – Again
Today the California Supreme Court denied Sprint’s latest petition for review of Bursor & Fisher’s $299 million trial victory for a class of 1.9 million Sprint customers who were charged illegal termination fees. After a month-long trial in 2008, the cl...
On December 17, 2012, Judge Arthur D. Spatt of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York appointed Bursor & Fisher, P.A. to serve as Interim Class Counsel in In re Sinus Buster Products Consumer Litigation, to represent a pr...
November 9, 2012
Reuters: “Dentists Sue Over NY Crane Collapse During Storm Sandy”
Today the California Court of Appeal denied Sprint’s latest appeal following a $299 million trial victory for a class of 1.9 million Sprint customers who were charged illegal termination fees. After a month-long trial in 2008, the class plaintiffs represented ...
September 19, 2012
Bursor & Fisher Appointed Interim Class Counsel in Scotts EZ Seed Litigation
On September 19, 2012, Judge Vincent Briccetti of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York appointed Bursor & Fisher, P.A. to serve as Interim Class Counsel in In re Scotts EZ Seed Litigation, to represent ...
July 11, 2012
Crest Sensitivity Toothpaste Lawsuit Moves Forward
On July 10, 2012, Judge Jose L. Linares of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that claims against Procter & Gamble for violations of state consumer protection laws and breaches of warranties could go forward as part of a putative na...