News

Today a California jury rejected Sprint’s billion-dollar cross-claim against a certified class of 2 million customers, in a second trial concerning Sprint’s illegal termination fees. After a month-long trial in 2008, the class represented by Bursor & Fisher prevailed on all of their claims challenging Sprint’s termination fees. The 2008 trial resulted in a finding that Sprint’s $150 an...

Click here to view the ABC News article discussing this case....

On July 11, 2013, Judge Kevin McNulty of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied defendants’ motions to dismiss and allowed class action claims to move forward against the makers of Samsung RF26VAB refrigerators and retailer Lowe’s stores. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants misrepresented the energy efficiency of Samsung RF26VAB refrigerators by promoting th...

Today the United States Supreme Court rejected Sprint’s petition for certiorari seeking review of Bursor & Fisher’s $299 million trial victory for a class of 1.9 million Sprint customers who were charged illegal termination fees. After a month-long trial in 2008, the class plaintiffs represented by Bursor & Fisher prevailed on all of their claims challenging Sprint’s termination fees...

On May 22, 2013, Judge Vincent Briccetti of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied defendants’ motions to dismiss and allowed class action claims against the makers of Scotts EZ Seed Turf Builder, as well as retailers Home Depot and Lowe’s, to move forward toward class certification. The lawsuit involves allegations that EZ Seed does not grow grass based ...

Today the California Supreme Court denied Sprint’s latest petition for review of Bursor & Fisher’s $299 million trial victory for a class of 1.9 million Sprint customers who were charged illegal termination fees. After a month-long trial in 2008, the class plaintiffs represented by Bursor & Fisher prevailed on all of their claims challenging Sprint’s termination fees. Sprint appea...

On December 17, 2012, Judge Arthur D. Spatt of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York appointed Bursor & Fisher, P.A. to serve as Interim Class Counsel in In re Sinus Buster Products Consumer Litigation, to represent a proposed nationwide class of purchasers of Sinus Buster products. Sinus Buster products are a line of capsaicin-based drugs sold online and in...

Click here to view the Reuters article discussing this case....

Today the California Court of Appeal denied Sprint’s latest appeal following a $299 million trial victory for a class of 1.9 million Sprint customers who were charged illegal termination fees. After a month-long trial in 2008, the class plaintiffs represented by Bursor & Fisher prevailed on all of their claims challenging Sprint’s termination fees. Sprint appealed the trial court’s ru...

On September 19, 2012, Judge Vincent Briccetti of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York appointed Bursor & Fisher, P.A. to serve as Interim Class Counsel in In re Scotts EZ Seed Litigation, to represent a proposed nationwide class of purchasers of Scotts Turf Builder EZ Seed. The lawsuit alleges that EZ Seed is a fundamentally defective product that does no...